Dubai's Digital Economy Court has upheld a worldwide freezing order over $456 million in assets connected to a reserve shortfall that forced crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun to cover losses for holders of the TrueUSD (TUSD) stablecoin.
The ruling, handed down on October 17 by Justice Michael Black KC, prevents funds tied to TUSD's reserves from being moved or liquidated while ownership claims are adjudicated in Hong Kong courts. The case centers on allegations that money backing TrueUSD was diverted into Aria Commodities DMCC, a Dubai-based trade-finance firm that financed commodity shipments and mining ventures in emerging markets.
According to lawyers for Techteryx, the issuer of TrueUSD, the transfers breached custody terms and converted liquid reserves into long-term loans and private investments, which could not be redeemed when holders attempted withdrawals. This led to a liquidity crisis and the $456 million gap later covered by Sun.
Justice Black stated that Techteryx had shown "serious issues to be tried" and a credible claim that the assets were held on constructive trust. He noted that Aria provided "no evidence" explaining the fund transfers or who controlled the resulting assets, and there was a "real risk" that Matthew William Brittain, Aria's controlling figure, could dissipate or restructure holdings to evade enforcement.
The funds were transferred between 2021 and 2022 through accounts managed by First Digital Trust in Hong Kong, which was responsible for safeguarding TUSD reserves. Techteryx alleges these arrangements violated custody agreements, while Brittain previously argued that liquidity issues were "a matter of term commitments" rather than mismanagement.
This case is being closely monitored as a precedent for cross-border legal scrutiny of stablecoin reserve management. The next phase will unfold in Hong Kong, where courts will determine whether the disputed assets belong to Techteryx or Aria's trading businesses. If Techteryx succeeds, the funds could be returned to TrueUSD's reserves to restore full backing.
The ruling highlights the growing regulatory pressures on stablecoin issuers to maintain transparent and liquid reserve structures, with potential implications for global digital asset litigation.