Binance Sues Trader Over Alleged '10/10' SOL Price Wick and Liquidation Dispute

4 hour ago 2 sources neutral

Key takeaways:

  • Traders should scrutinize exchange liquidation mechanisms and alert systems for leveraged positions.
  • This legal dispute highlights regulatory arbitrage risks as exchanges shift jurisdictional addresses.
  • The case may pressure exchanges to enhance transparency around price wicks and margin calls.

A cryptocurrency trader, Edison Zhang (known as @edisonzz on X), is facing a lawsuit from Binance after publicly accusing the exchange of causing a market event that liquidated his leveraged positions. The dispute centers on a sharp price movement, or "wick," in the SOL/USDT trading pair on October 11, 2025.

Zhang published an open letter detailing his claims, supported by trade screenshots. He stated his long positions were liquidated at a price of $145, but the market low on Binance at the time dipped to $141. This downward wick, he alleges, pushed the price below his liquidation threshold, triggering an automatic closure. "Everything had been wiped out. My account was at zero. Ten years of heart and soul vanished into thin air," Zhang lamented.

He further claims he received no SMS or email margin call alerts prior to the liquidation. After the incident, attempts to resolve the matter through Binance customer support were unsuccessful, with tickets rejected and conversations stalling.

Zhang initially considered seeking recourse through Abu Dhabi's Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) but learned it regulates a different Binance entity (Binance FZE). In December 2025, he discovered Binance Global had changed its registered address to the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM). His public posts about pursuing action through ADGM prompted a cease-and-desist notice dated February 3, 2026, from law firm Al Tamimi & Company, which represents Nest Exchange Limited, the operator of Binance.com.

According to Zhang, Binance's representatives cited his support chat records and insisted that seeking recourse through FSRA would be "illegal," directing him instead to formal arbitration at the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) or the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). The exchange has reportedly set a deadline of March 1, 2026, for initiating such proceedings.

Disclaimer

The content on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or professional consultation. Crypto assets are high-risk and volatile — you may lose all funds. Some materials may include summaries and links to third-party sources; we are not responsible for their content or accuracy. Any decisions you make are at your own risk. Coinalertnews recommends independently verifying information and consulting with a professional before making any financial decisions based on this content.