Bitcoin MVRV Ratio Slides to 1.1, Edging Just Above Historic Market Bottom Territory

1 hour ago 2 sources neutral

Key takeaways:

  • The MVRV drop to 1.1 may be a weaker buy signal now due to institutional supply concentration.
  • Regulatory risks, like the contested crypto bill, could push Bitcoin into full capitulation below 1.0 MVRV.
  • Tokenization's record growth suggests capital rotation into infrastructure plays like Ethereum may overshadow Bitcoin.

Bitcoin’s market value to realized value (MVRV) ratio has declined to 1.1, a level that has historically aligned with cycle bottoms, according to on-chain data from CryptoQuant. The metric sits just above the so-called green zone—a band where BTC price has repeatedly been considered undervalued. For traders tracking the network’s cost-basis, this is the closest Bitcoin has come to a major discount signal in months.

The MVRV ratio divides the current market capitalization by the realized cap, which represents the aggregate price at which each coin last moved. When the ratio dips below 1, it indicates the average holder is underwater. At 1.1, Bitcoin is not in full capitulation, but it’s close enough to draw attention from investors who use on-chain data to time accumulation windows. Past instances, such as the March 2020 crash, the late-2018 bear market floor, and the 2015 bear market bottom, saw MVRV near or below 1 coincide with macro cycle lows, often followed by sharp rebounds.

The current reading suggests the market is pricing in significant doubt, potentially driven by macro headwinds, regulatory developments, or range-bound trading. Notably, banks are pushing to derail a major US crypto bill just days before a Senate vote, injecting fresh uncertainty into institutional outlook. At the same time, tokenization markets are booming—the value of real-world assets on-chain has crossed $20 billion—demonstrating that blockchain infrastructure remains active.

However, the signal may not carry the same weight as in earlier cycles. The realized cap today is much higher due to years of institutional inflows and larger holders, which could mean a ratio of 1.1 has a different statistical significance if supply is concentrated among less price-sensitive hands. Moreover, the macro environment in mid-2026, with its own liquidity conditions and rate expectations, makes direct historical comparisons precarious. Still, false undervaluation signals are rare, and the market rarely spends extended periods at these levels without eventually resolving higher. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining whether this represents a bargain zone or a warning flag.

Disclaimer

The content on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or professional consultation. Crypto assets are high-risk and volatile — you may lose all funds. Some materials may include summaries and links to third-party sources; we are not responsible for their content or accuracy. Any decisions you make are at your own risk. Coinalertnews recommends independently verifying information and consulting with a professional before making any financial decisions based on this content.