Arthur Hayes Under Fire as Maelstrom Fund Dumps $CARDS After Bullish $4 Target

3 hour ago 1 sources negative

Key takeaways:

  • Arthur Hayes' $CARDS sale after his $4 call reveals a potential pump-and-dump, undermining retail trust.
  • Smart money's profit-taking during Hayes' accumulation suggests institutional skepticism of the bullish target.
  • Retail traders should scrutinize influencers' price predictions when on-chain flows show contradictory selling.

The crypto community is scrutinizing Arthur Hayes and his Maelstrom Fund following revelations of a significant sale of $CARDS tokens shortly after Hayes posted an ambitious $4 price target.

On-chain data analyzed by Nansen shows a wallet linked to the Maelstrom Fund accumulated 6.82 million $CARDS (approximately $2 million) within 24 hours after the fund published its "Collector Crypt" thesis, which highlighted the project's potential in tokenizing real-world trading cards. The token, native to the Collector Crypt platform on Solana, enables the conversion of physical cards into redeemable NFTs, and its price then hovered around $0.30. On June 24, Arthur Hayes publicly shared a $4 target for $CARDS on social media, boosting optimism among retail traders.

However, just one day later, the Maelstrom Fund transferred $1.92 million worth of $CARDS to flowdesk_co, effectively offloading a large portion of its position. This rapid succession of events — from accumulation to a bullish forecast followed by an immediate dump — has sparked allegations of market manipulation and conflicts of interest. Nansen’s data further highlighted a split: while notable figures like @CryptoHayes (believed to be Hayes) were accumulating, smart money wallets were simultaneously trimming their holdings, and institutional investors appeared to be taking profits.

As of now, $CARDS is trading near $0.23, well below the $0.30 level at the time of the target call, raising questions about the true intent behind the $4 prediction. Hayes, a former BitMEX co-founder with a controversial history, has not publicly addressed the backlash. The incident underscores the need for caution when following influential voices in crypto, particularly when large holders exhibit contradictory behavior.

Disclaimer

The content on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or professional consultation. Crypto assets are high-risk and volatile — you may lose all funds. Some materials may include summaries and links to third-party sources; we are not responsible for their content or accuracy. Any decisions you make are at your own risk. Coinalertnews recommends independently verifying information and consulting with a professional before making any financial decisions based on this content.