Chinese Prosecutors Call for Stronger Crypto AML Rules and Blockchain Evidence Standards

2 hour ago 5 sources neutral

Key takeaways:

  • Stricter AML laws may spur USDT outflows from Chinese OTC desks, weakening its peg.
  • Enhanced blockchain forensics could pressure privacy coins like Monero as detection improves.
  • Asset recovery hurdles may deter institutional adoption, favoring jurisdictions with clear frameworks.

Chinese legal experts have proposed a comprehensive overhaul of the country's legal framework to better combat cryptocurrency-related money laundering. In a paper titled Systematically Solve the Legal System Dilemma of Money Laundering Using Virtual Currency, prosecutors Yang Yingjie, Guo Shaoyou, and Liu Xinqi argue that current criminal laws and investigative practices are inadequate for blockchain-enabled financial crime.

The paper highlights how decentralized networks, pseudonymous transactions, and seamless cross-border transfers have made it easier for criminals to conceal illicit funds. It points to growing legal gaps in criminal classification, digital evidence collection, and asset recovery. The experts note that while China’s revised Anti-Money Laundering Law no longer restricts predicate offenses, Article 191 of the Criminal Law still limits standalone money laundering charges to only seven specific crimes, forcing prosecutors to rely on other statutes.

Key recommendations include broader judicial guidance to mandate money laundering reviews alongside underlying crime investigations, wider use of blockchain analysis to trace digital assets and strengthen evidence, and earlier involvement of prosecutors in major cases. The paper also urges courts to recognize blockchain records as authentic evidence when verified independently and to grant formal evidentiary status to blockchain forensic reports.

Challenges in recovering seized crypto assets are attributed to China’s restrictions on cryptocurrency circulation and the lack of unified procedures for handling digital assets, as well as cross-border legal inconsistencies. The authors call for stronger supervisory reviews and adjustments to prosecutorial performance metrics to emphasize asset recovery and standalone money laundering charges.

Disclaimer

The content on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or professional consultation. Crypto assets are high-risk and volatile — you may lose all funds. Some materials may include summaries and links to third-party sources; we are not responsible for their content or accuracy. Any decisions you make are at your own risk. Coinalertnews recommends independently verifying information and consulting with a professional before making any financial decisions based on this content.