Cardano Foundation Responds to EU MiCA Review with Focus on DeFi and Staking

47 minute ago 2 sources neutral

Key takeaways:

  • Cardano's tech-neutral MiCAR stance could lower regulatory risk for ADA staking, boosting long-term confidence.
  • Distinguishing protocol staking from custody could benefit ADA holders, though EU fragmentation poses risks.
  • Watch MiCAR consultation outcomes as a catalyst for institutional ADA adoption and sentiment.

The Cardano Foundation has formally submitted its response to the European Commission's consultation reviewing the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, known as MiCAR. The submission, dated October 21, 2026, sets out recommendations on how the framework should evolve as regulators assess its effectiveness.

The Foundation emphasized technological neutrality, proportionality, and regulation based on actual functions and risks rather than the underlying technology. It argued that the existing distinction between MiCAR and established European financial-services legislation, particularly MiFID II, should remain in place. According to the response, an asset's classification should depend on its substantive characteristics rather than how it is technically represented.

The submission also called for greater legal clarity around hybrid tokens, changing asset characteristics, and differing interpretations among EU Member States. However, the Cardano Foundation stressed that improving legal certainty should not require expanding regulatory scope or creating unnecessary overlaps between frameworks.

A major portion of the response examined decentralized finance, staking, and participation in public blockchain infrastructure. The Foundation recommended against introducing separate regulatory regimes simply because decentralized technology is involved. Instead, it advocated regulating identifiable parties that perform controlled functions or exercise meaningful authority over assets and transactions.

On staking, the Foundation noted that Cardano users can delegate stake to support network consensus and security without giving up custody of their assets or locking them. It argued that direct protocol-level participation should be distinguished from staking services that involve custody or discretionary management. The response also opposed expanding MiCAR's regulatory perimeter through new standalone frameworks for DeFi, staking, or other protocol-level participation.

Disclaimer

The content on this website is provided for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, an offer, or professional consultation. Crypto assets are high-risk and volatile — you may lose all funds. Some materials may include summaries and links to third-party sources; we are not responsible for their content or accuracy. Any decisions you make are at your own risk. Coinalertnews recommends independently verifying information and consulting with a professional before making any financial decisions based on this content.